L'Humanité in English
Translation of selective papers from the french daily newspaper l'Humanité
decorHome > Society > Éric Fassin, sociologist at the faculty of political science and gender (...)
 

EditorialWorldPoliticsEconomySocietyCultureScience & TechnologySportInternational Communist and Labor Press"Tribune libre"Comment and OpinionBlogsLinks
About France, read also
decorDefense Secret - A Breach of the Rule of Law decorFarmers: a world on the edge of the abyss decor"I could never have imagined what was waiting for us" decorAlice Tavares ordeal as she is thrown out of her home decorEmmanuel Macron Does Another Favour for the Rich decorThe Spinetta Report, a Catastophic Scenario for the Railways decorSolidarity: 300,000 older people are “socially dead” decorDiplomacy from Atlanticism to Gaullism, Macron Embodies all the Lines decorAgribusiness. Intensive farming: Chicken Little was right decorFuture of France’s Front National: Interview with political scientist Jean-Yves Camus decorInequality still rife with one in five children living in poverty decorThe Assassination of Maurice Audin, a Crime d’État
About Europe, read also
decorThe IMF goes against its liberal doctrine decorMigration: four immediate measures that the EU could take decorThe social democrats provide fragile support for Syriza in Europe decorJordi Savall Composes His Musical-And-Textual Works Against Oblivion decorWill Politics Save Democracy from Populism? decorGhaleb Bencheikh: ’A Muslim, With a Deep-Seated Passion for Liberty’ decorG20 Summit Haunted by Fear of Democracy decorNietzsche as the " European Buddha " decorPassionate Neoliberal Chosen by European Parliament Coalition decorBerlin Suspends its Ratification of the Lisbon Treaty decorMr Hyde in Brussels decorEuropeans will spend less for the festive season.
Society

Éric Fassin, sociologist at the faculty of political science and gender studies at Paris-VIII Vincennes-Saint-Denis (*)

Translated Monday 1 June 2015, by Adrian Jordan

“There is plurality in the logic of domination”

“Inequality should be spoken of in the plural. This is the lesson of the last decades. Certainly, there is class, now as ever. But one has to admit there are also those discriminations which hit women and sexual and racial minorities. It is not about replacing one determinant with another: one does not preclude the other. The challenge is to take account of the plurality of the logic of domination. Once it is admitted, for example, that a black middle-class person is also victim of discrimination and, therefore, class does not efface the colour of skin, all that is left is to comprehend that the two notions interrelate but one does not supervene the other.

The term intersectionality is used in social science and in militant movements. There are groups which are doubly indivisible because they are at the intersection of two forms of discrimination (such as sex and race, as is seen in “black feminism”); but no trait is dismissed. Additionally, these characteristics interact with each other: one cannot conceive these characteristics (class, sex, race, etc) independently of one another. To be an “Arab” or “Arabess”, in France today, is not the same thing, though the supposed origin is taken from ideas of genre. Today we must all consider the rise in class inequality and worsening discrimination in neoliberal Europe, in other words, the ties between economic policies and the xenophobia and racism of the state. Urgent sociological and political analysis must be made of the complexities of inequality.

(*) Latest publication: ”Gauche : l’avenir d’une désillusion”. Éditions Textuel, 2014.


Follow site activity RSS 2.0 | Site Map | Translators’ zone | SPIP